Home > Blogs > Official Husker Locker Blog > HOLIDAY BOWL: Oh, the Places These Huskers Could Go
Official Husker Locker Blog
2009 Dec 31
HOLIDAY BOWL: Oh, the Places These Huskers Could Go
2,922 views
Turns out Bo Pelini had a reason to strut in San Diego. A reason to gift-wrap a six-day break for his team before Christmas. A reason to bust out some lofty talk about 2010 in a handful of interviews.
What did Bo know? Something. That’s for damn sure.
Three plays, one Matt O’Hanlon pick, one quick Zac Lee touchdown, a dash of the Wildcat starring Rex Burkhead, Niles Paul as a triple threat, that magnificent golden foot of Alex Henery and Blackshirts, Blackshirts, Blackshirts.
First round knockout. Boom! Down! Nebraska as Mike Tyson, and Arizona as a weak-kneed Michael Spinks.
“We got whacked,” Arizona head coach Mike Stoops.
Yep. Thumped. Striped. Punished. Seems like the two teams did their share of trash talking during the week at joint functions, and the muddy blood carried over to Wednesday night. Like so many fights that start with a couple of loose jaws, it ended with one party - the Wildcats - on the floor - a jigsaw puzzle with a couple of pieces gone.
Savor this Big Red ribeye of a win, Cornhusker fans. It tasted so good, sizzling from the start - and mostly because NU cooked it just so. In all three phases, I can’t recall a more complete bowl win since the 2000 Alamo Bowl. And even there, Nebraska had a few leaks. You might have to go back to the 1996 Fiesta Bowl. Or the 1969 Sun Bowl, when NU beat Georgia 45-6. Or maybe never. I’m leaning toward never.
At some point, Stoops stopped with his Jimmy Cagney/George C. Scott facial grimaces and submitted to total defeat. His willingness to forego an easy field goal at the end of the game and try for a touchdown - knowing full well his quarterback would face a seven-man blitz - was not merely a nod to his old friend Bo. It was a tip of the cap to the Husker defense as a whole. You’ve earned the right to shut us out. Good for Stoops. Intense guy. Class move.
Yes, the Blackshirts evoked memories of those days of heaven, the mid-1990s, when opposing quarterbacks gazed wistfully into the defense in the mere hope of completing a pass. Foles had that “blow-the-whistle!” look all night, his impressive arm - yes, I’ve seen it in other games - reduced to a bad parody of the Balloon Boy saga. Just 21 snaps in the first half. For 32 yards. And the Huskers didn’t even have to commit a blitzer on the pass rush. TV can’t do justice to how well NU’s cornerbacks challenge and blanket opposing receivers, so Foles, with the relative mobility of Pooh Bear, had no choice but to dance around, fruitlessly searching for downfield targets.
Once again, we saw irrefutable evidence that the best way to great defense is through a quarterback’s rattled cage. How many signal-callers have answered the bell vs. NU this year? In retrospect, just one: Texas Tech’s Sticks Sheffield.
“It’s nothing fancy,” Pelini said. In a sense, he’s right. Challenging receivers at the line of scrimmage, and taking away those easy throws spread teams thrive on isn’t fancy. Doesn’t mean it’s easy, either, but it’s not fancy. And the recipe works.
The secondary was nothing short of brilliant. I doubt Arizona had ever seen such aggressive coverage. A healthy Alfonzo Dennard, coupled with a healthy Prince Amukamara, might be as good a cornerback tandem as there is in college football.
And color me pleased by the offense, and impressed with offensive coordinator Shawn Watson from this perspective: He said NU would travel back in time with its offense, and that’s precisely what we saw Wednesday night.
Nebraska spread it out and mixed pass and run. Zac Lee throws much better out of the shotgun, and runs a competent zone read, even if he takes the ball too often. The big wrinkle - the Wildcat - was more of a no-brainer, considering how good Rex Burkhead was at running it, but it was good to see Watson actually put it on film and put it to good use.
Burkhead is a keeper. He runs hard, headlong, with the occasional surprising flourish - a spin move, a hard cut. A little Correll Buckhalter. A little Derek Brown. A little Josh Davis. Watson has a weapon there, whether or not Burkhead stays at the Wildcat QB, or hands the reins to Taylor Martinez.
Does Watson have a quarterback? Lee took a step forward Wednesday night, but I still think he is inconsistent and a little robotic as a runner. Cody Green, who burned a timeout and nearly threw a bad interception, again looked adrift and ill-prepared on the field. But it’s hard to get a grip in a couple drives when Lee gets the whole game.
Unfortunately, you don’t get the offensive sequel for nine months. You won’t even get a sneak peek trailer for four months. And don’t presume that Nebraska solved its problems in one bowl game. Arizona seemed struck by the stage and the stakes. Stoops’ team needs to grow up some. I suspect that he knew that earlier in the week, and hoped it wouldn’t matter too much in the game. But it did.
Arizona’s at now where Nebraska resided in early 2008. What a journey since then for the Big Red. Despite the kind of losses that make you want to starve for a week, Pelini pulled his troops through, and has them positioned for a national title run in 2010.
I don’t know about the Huskers being “five times better” next year. For one thing, a lot of pro-style offenses roll onto the schedule, and you can’t just trot Dejon Gomes out there at linebacker to stop the inside counter. The Huskers absolutely must find two or three serviceable linebackers.
But, provided Nebraska does that, a trip to Phoenix - for one of two BCS games held there - should be the early expectation. The Big 12 will be ripe for the plucking. The best of NU’s recruiting classes - the 2007 bunch rotates fully into upperclassmen mode. That solid class of 2008 - that included all of the red shirt freshmen, finally begins to contribute more, as well.
Hope springs eternal. Football championships are autumnal. I think we have 33 reasons to put those two sentiments together for next year.
Permanent Link to this Blog Post
Tags: holiday bowl, bo pelini, zac lee, matt ohanlon, cody green, rex burkhead, shawn watson, niles paul, alex henery, ndamukong suh
Home > Blogs > Official Husker Locker Blog > HOLIDAY BOWL: Oh, the Places These Huskers Could Go


Husker6_5...great objectivity after the post bowl hoopla (too bad some of the "real" journalist aren't as objective).
– Jan 4, 2010
I wouldn't be crowing so much about how dominant we were in all three phases of the game. Our offense was still spotty at best throughout the night, and any comparison to the '96 Fiesta Bowl is merely sophomoric journalistic hyperbole. We shot ourselves in the foot on at least six offensive series during the game and came out of those drives with four field goals, and once again in a game, failing to put the ball in the end zone when deep inside the Red Zone. Mental mistakes on the O-line resulting in drive-killing penalties and missed blocking assignments once again - or does the author forget the well-televised tirade of Barney on the sidelines following another mental gaff by the same O-lineman? No, nowhere near the '96 Fiesta Bowl, not even close to the same caliber of opponent as Florida was back then, and certainly NOT the score a TD at will offense demonstrated in that game in '96.
Aside from the 6 yard drive at the opening of the game and the long strike in the third quarter, remove those 14 points and you have an offense that could not sustain a drive with any consistency and scored only 4 more points than in the Va Tech game, right back where we started from facing a decent opponent. Remember, it was our offense, not the defense, that lost the Big XII title game due to not being able to once again put the ball INTO the end zone. A bitter pill to swallow, but the truth.
What this game did show, though, was that there is a lot of potential for next year's team to be better offensively, and we'll have a far better picture of that at the close of fall camp.
Oh, and BTW to the author, if you want to use a boxing allegory to describe the game, the Tyson-Spinks one is the wrong one to use. At the time they met, Spinks was a champion who was past his prime as a boxer. A better allegory would have been the Tyson-Tubbs bout. Tubbs who was a younger, inexperienced boxer than Spinks, had his belt fall into his lap when he won it, and it was VERY apparent in that fight (what very little there was) that while both had about the same amount of pro experience as young boxers, Tyson far outclassed Tubbs in the few seconds it lasted.
– Jan 3, 2010
this was the most complete game by the Huskers in a decade - a rather miserable decade.
– Dec 31, 2009